![]() |
|
|
Public Health Service Guidelines The PHS guideline was developed by a private-sector panel of experts convened by a consortium of Federal and non-Federal partners. It is the product of a 2-year effort by a panel of tobacco dependence experts, representatives from sponsoring organizations, and professional staff. The guideline builds on a smoking cessation guideline first issued by the Federal Government in 1996. The partners that convened the experts included the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the University of Wisconsin Medical School's Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention. Employing explicit scientific methodology and expert clinical judgment, the panel developed recommendations on the successful treatment of tobacco use and dependence.
The purpose of these guidelines are to provide clinicians, tobacco dependence specialists, public health professionals, health care administrators, insurers, purchasers, and tobacco users with evidence-based recommendations regarding clinical interventions use a systems approach to address smoking cessation. The key recommendations offered by the guidelines are as follows:
Provision of practical counseling (problem solving/skills training); Provision of social support as part of treatment (intra-treatment social support); and Help in securing social support outside of treatment (extra- treatment social support)
(The links for the complete guidelines have been provided in the resources section.)
The guidelines identify five first-line pharmacotherapies as reliable for increasing long-term smoking abstinence rates:
Clonidine and Nortriptyline were identified as effective second-line pharmacotherapies and may be considered by clinicians if first-line pharmacotherapies are found to be not effective. Over-the-counter nicotine patches are effective relative to placebo, and their use should be encouraged.
|
|
|